doctortriggers:

when someone asks if they can draw or write you a thingimage

131473
c
VIA: areyoutryingtodeduceme ORIGINALLY FROM: doctortriggers
art    drawing    

kastiakbc:

breebird33:

angryseawitch:

screamingcrawfish:

a paranormal mockumentary show in the style of the office/parks and rec

revolving around the lives of employees at a hokey haunted mansion tourist trap that turn out to be actually hella haunted but most of its spirits are either benevolent or ineffectively malevolent

10/10 WOULD WATCH

image

SOMEONE MAKE THIS SHOW HAPPEN,

93747
c
VIA: kastiakbc ORIGINALLY FROM: screamingcrawfish
art    omg    I WILL THROW SO MUCH MONEY TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN    

cross-connect:

Artist Samantha Keely Smith paints breathtaking abstract landscapes that resemble the swirling waters of the ocean. Using oil paint, enamel, and shellac, Smith builds up multiple translucent layers of color, alternating between soft brushstrokes and large, sweeping gestures to evoke crashing waves, surging tides, and stormy floods.

Via 

// Selected by Sunil

86603
c
VIA: inkclaws ORIGINALLY FROM: cross-connect
art    Samantha Keely Smith    

caravaggista:

Karl Brullov, The Last Day of Pompeii (1830 - 1833)

Heartbreak, unspeakable loss, disaster… 

1890
c
VIA: vananaz ORIGINALLY FROM: caravaggista
Art    Pompeii    

sadfries:

are you fucking kidding me

468966
c
VIA: vanilllabear ORIGINALLY FROM: wankoce4n
art    
art    sculpture    

illustratedkate:

kate’s trouble-free guide on how to tell if drawings are reposts:

  1. the op will not have an art blog, regularly post art, or have an art tag. basically, if they don’t also have some other work in a feasibly similar style, they probably stole it from somewhere else
  2. the images are often cropped weirdly. this is because the op is lazy and can’t even screenshot things properly without wrecking them
  3. the images might be arranged in an order that doesn’t make sense. this is because the op has browsed an artist’s tumblr, screenshot things haphazardly and then re-uploaded them. as a result, the post will probably have no clear direction or sense of continuity
  4. there’s no artist comment, and trust me on this: we artists like to say why we drew a thing. we will rarely just post a drawing with no caption - and if we DO post one with no caption, our tags will have some frantic garbled explanation of the drawing or why we did it or what went wrong when we drew it. trust me.

how should you deal with a repost?

  • don’t reblog it
  • don’t reblog it
  • please don’t reblog it we artists are poor and frazzled so at the very least, please let us keep our dignity!!
230
c
art    Signal Boost    also    don't repost shit    it's not that hard to find the original source    so don't be an asshole    

windycarnage:

also people should keep in mind that sometimes when an artist says “doodle" what they mean is "stress-free art”. that doesn’t necessarily mean that the “doodle” they made is something that they didn’t work hard at or didn’t spend a long time on. some people get really out of control when they see impressive works and the artist write “just a doodle” and they think, this is it, this is the end, im no longer going to be an artist, how can i possibly compare myself.

sometimes “just a doodle” means “not working on commissions or something work-based”, so don’t fret yourselves. plus not everyone who posts art plans on a bunch of people seeing it. you don’t really expect your stupid poorly written artist caption to be seen by a lot of people via reblogs,

18201
c
VIA: areyoutryingtodeduceme ORIGINALLY FROM: windycarnage
art    

deandraws:

cashtier:

when someone do a draw for u
image
image

image

THIS. THIS EXACT THING. THIS IS ME AND PEOPLE THAT DRAW ME THINGS.

261600
c
VIA: cyborgnebula ORIGINALLY FROM: cashtier
about me    art    
518
c
VIA: kreugan
art    
390
c
VIA: kreugan
art    

Anselmo Miguel Nieto - Mata Hari c. 1905-1915 (via)

Anselmo Miguel Nieto - Mata Hari c. 1905-1915 (via)

1284
c
anselmo miguel nieto    art    mata hari    1900s    
christinebian:

After watching the documentary The Secret Lives of Wolves over the weekend, I’ve got wolves on the brain! Some more studies.

christinebian:

After watching the documentary The Secret Lives of Wolves over the weekend, I’ve got wolves on the brain! Some more studies.

1557
c
VIA: inkclaws ORIGINALLY FROM: christinebian
Wolves    art    

sparklefarts-and-gossamerwings:

innocenttmaan:

Jim Dingilian proves that a creative and skillful artist can create works of art with just about anything. By coating the interior of empty glass bottles with black smoke and then carefully brushing it away with tools mounted on dowels, he creates detailed and beautiful but dark works of smoke art that are dripping with a sense of suburban decay.

What the… WHAAAAAAT!?

Wow this is amazing.

4893
c
VIA: bmoreprincess ORIGINALLY FROM: innocenttmaan
Art    

medievalpoc:

beggars-opera:

I’ve seen a few fashion posts trying to expand the “Marie Antoinette is not Victorian” rant, but this stuff can get complicated, so here is a semi-comprehensive list so everyone knows exactly when all of these eras were.

Please note that this is very basic and that there are sometimes subcategories (especially in the 17th century, Jacobean, Restoration, etc)

And people wonder WHY I complain about History/Art History periodization. Note how much overlap there is to the above “eras”, and how many exceptions and extensions there are to these categories.

Oh, and by the way…

Tudor:

image

Elizabethan:

image

Stuart:

image

Georgian:

image

Regency:

image

Victorian:

image

Edwardian:

image

Because you wouldn’t want to be historically inaccurate.

86834
c
VIA: medievalpoc ORIGINALLY FROM: beggars-opera
Art    History